Literature collection

A structured, growing collection of microbiome-related scientific literature that has been reviewed or considered relevant to interpretation on this site. It is intentionally neutral and does not imply validation or consensus.

Entries are not filtered by certainty or consensus. The point is traceability—what each study asserts and where its limits are—not authority or agreement.

Collection entries

One claim per study. Mixed, uncertain, or conflicting findings sit alongside stronger ones; nothing here is ranked or scored.

human mouse mixed

PaperOne-sentence claimStudy typeLimitationTags
HDepommier et al., 2017, Nature MedicinePasteurized A. muciniphila supplementation improved insulin sensitivity in overweight adults.RCT (human)Small sample; specific preparation and dose; not a consumer stool test endpointakkermansia, intervention, metabolism
MEverard et al., 2013, PNASObese mice had lower A. muciniphila abundance, and restoring it improved metabolic markers.Preclinical (mouse)Animal model; not direct evidence for human test interpretationakkermansia, obesity, metabolism
HHuman Microbiome Project Consortium, 2012, NatureHealthy human gut microbiomes are highly variable between individuals but stable within individuals over time.Observational cohort2012 sequencing depth and methods; limited diversity samplingdiversity, baseline, methodology
+Valdes et al., 2018, BMJDiet influences gut microbiome composition, but causal effects on long-term health outcomes remain incompletely defined.ReviewHeterogeneous primary studies; association-heavy fielddiet, interpretation, evidence-limits